" /> Media Fix: January 2006 Archives

« December 2005 | Main | February 2006 »

January 27, 2006

The Biafran Controversy: Field Notes

BiafraNetLogo.jpg
Source: http://biafranet.com/
Hey again.
Here are some of the field notes I compiled today.
Check 'em out.

Email ethnography: -Different styles of email writing depending on org. or individual: see email drafts. – More colloquial for e-groups, friends, family/ more professional for professional orgs and Biafran reps. Also, I used my real first name, but never used my last name in any of the emails. I used my hotmail address for all email correspondence, and probably will delete it once this research has been completed. Did not want to use yahoo email cause it’s for family and friends, and school email is for school only – do not want this stuff interfering with school stuff, cause they might easily identify me!

- Generally, site is very well structured and organized, give or take a few authoring problems, such as faulty links and outdated information. Site obviously promotes Biafra and clearly dictates why and how Biafra can be actualized. Many tools they use help their cause, such as information archives, sections and tools for activism, exposés of Nigeria’s corruption (thus, leading to reasons why Biafra should secede from Nigeria), membership information, and interactive areas (discussion groups, e-groups, live chat format). The site also has links to other sites, including major sites like the US diplomatic archive. They claim that their site information is accurate and backed by fact, but it is obvious that all their info is used to promote Biafra, and is thus biased and subjective. For instance, there are reports that the governmentt detained Biafran’s, but we do not really know the real reasons why…in fact, we do not really get the full story in most of the articles on this site. Words like “Jihad”and “Genocide” are used to clearly and explicitly relate government and northern and non-Biafran aggression towards Biafrans as unjust and fundamentalist, and there are some interesting links, such as the 9/11 link. Maybe they are linking such terrorism to terrorism towards the Biafrans.

The group wants to achieve their goal through PEACEFUL means, not violence, as I earlier assumed. Thus, it seems like they have been able to make a lot of headway on actual actualization, as they have organized hundreds of conferences, events and protests which can be viewed on the site.

Joined biafraland e-group:
I wrote; “Hi. I would like to join the group as an interested researcher on Biafran culture.”
http://groups.yahoo.com/ - confirmation to come … looks like I got in!

The Biafran Controversy: New Outline

biaframovement.jpg
Biafran protest.
Source:http://www.biafraland.com

Hey people.
Hope you're all doing aight.
By clicking the llink below, you can view my updated outline for the final assignment, which basically shows how I will structure my paper.
Peace.

ESSAY OUTLINE:

Pro-Biafran sites: http://www.biafraland.com & http://biafranet.com/
Anti-Biafran site: home.arcor.de/biafra/
Nuetral Site: http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/

Central Question:

How does the internet create a new public sphere for the Biafran controversy?
Sub-Questions:
How is the internet used as a sphere for social activism, civil disobedience and radical media regarding the Biafran controversy?

How effective/ineffective is the internet in providing this sphere (Can the internet directly affect real world policies and action)? What are the possibilities and limitations of dealing with this issue online?

How do traditional media compare to the internet in dealing with the controversy (similarities and differences)?

How does such media use affect real world policies and action relating to the Biafran controversy?

Structure of paper:

1) Introduction:
Lead in to Biafran controversy: Something coming from my own perspective - Dad fought in war/Biafran national anthem snippet – then state objective of article and main research finding. (Somewhere in this section, mention role of the internet and the websites involved in the controversy) (Interviewee reactions). (1 – 1 ½ pages)

2) Explain the Biafran controversy – Background and brief history of how the controversy started and why it is still prevalent today + what people are arguing about it today. (2 pages)

3) Analyze pro Biafran site (briafraland.com) - how website supports and/or even enhances cause. - relate to theory + interviewee reactions (3 pages)

4) Analyze second pro-Biafran site (biafranet) (1.5 pages)

5) Analyze anti-Biafran site (arcor.de) – how website attacks and opposes cause + interviewee reactions (3 pages)


6) Analyze neutral site – (naijavillagesquare) (1.5 pages)

7) Can older media do this? (1 page)

8) Final thoughts & conclusion – Bring it back to Biafraland/overall reaction by interviewees – explicit answer of research findings and the central question. (1 page)

*Relate everything to theory throughout article

Theory links: Public Resistance and Radical Media (social movements online - activist groups conducting and enhancing their cause online)

Pictures of civil war (between Biafran states and the Nigerian government) - http://www.peterwilliams.ch/PeterWilliams_intro_Biafra_1.htm

January 23, 2006

Let the Truth Be Told: the Satire that is the Second Civil War

Film not Oscar-caliber, but comically insightful, relevant

scw.jpg

What do you get when you add political waywardness, media manipulation and a good serving of "grab 'em by the throat" news? You get the media satire The Second Civil War, a dark comedy that touches on many socio-political and media culture issues relevant to today's society. Looking into his crystal ball, writer Martyn Burke teams up with director Joe Dante to portray a mismanaged and sensationalist America set some time in the future. With an ensemble cast that includes Beau Bridges, Phil Hartman, James Earl Jones, Elizabeth Peña, and Dennis Leary, the movie does not disappoint.

The film is seen through the lens of a CNN-like fictional cable news organization, News Net, which creates a media field day from a story beginning with Pakistani orphans seeking refuge in Idaho after their country is devastated by a nuclear attack. The only problem is that the anti-immigration Governor of Idaho, Jim Farley (Bridges), refuses to take in the orphans, taking this a step further by closing his borders to the rest of the country. Back at the state capital, the wide-eyed and naïve president (Hartman) depends on impractical advisors to tell him what to do in this difficult situation, and eventually decides to forcefully open Idaho’s borders through military action. However, Idaho won’t go down without a fight, militarily enlisting neighboring fellow anti-immigration states like South Carolina to help their cause; and just like that, the country is on the brink of a “second civil war.” In the middle of all this absurdity, the Governor is involved in a love-affair gone awry with News Net reporter Christina Fernandez (Peña), apparently more concerned about her than the potential devastation occurring in his back yard. Not only does News Net capitalize on this “prime time” conflict, as it could serve as a potential ratings booster in the face of intense media competition, the conflict is escalated even further as a result of the channel’s miscommunication and mismanagement. The movie is narrated by Jim Kalla (Jones), a veteran News Net reporter who laments on the days when news “came to us slower,” giving one time to absorb what one was watching on TV, unlike now where live, up-to-the-minute and sensational “on the scene” news takes center stage.

Media priorities are intermixed with political and personal priorities in the movie, as News Net, from the beginning of the conflict, constantly strive to over-dramatize and sensationalize every situation. For instance, producer Alan Manieski (Ron Pearlman) tries to capitalize on the refugee crisis by adding special effects to his news coverage, such as putting “violins over the orphans.” Thus, the audience can be rest assured that the story will be a dramatic “tear jerker,” keeping them tuned in and bringing in big ratings. The core of the story may be lost over all the special effects, but as Dante clearly and cynically shows, Manieski is more concerned about ratings than anything else. This is an obvious but very accurate portrayal of cable news producers that will use any dramatic and extravagant means at their disposal to garner more money and fame.

Dante also shows us how media has the power to misinform and misconstrue, which could potentially lead to catastrophic situations. For instance, Governor Farley informs a reporter that he has decided to step down and run off with Fernandez. The reporter misinterprets Governor Farley’s declaration to have someone “succeed” him from office as “secede.” Once the white house gets word of this supposed threat of revolt, an all out attack on Idaho results, even though this could have been avoided with better communication. This is another obvious stab at media incompetence, but nonetheless funny and true.

Hartman’s role as the American President is priceless; a much needed breath of fresh air from the overbearingly dark humor of much of the movie. A hilarious scene involves the President giving Idaho 67 and ½ hours, as opposed to an earlier deadline of 72 hours, to open their borders before he declares war; in order to avoid interrupting a special episode of “All My Children.” As his fellow soap-opera loving advisor’s point out, the last time he interrupted the show, he lost the women’s vote. This scene not only show’s where the President’s political priorities are, but also shows how entertainment and Hollywood take’s a front seat over more pressing and serious political issues.

Dante’s accurate portrayal of media sensationalism and immediacy is seen when News Net reporters travel to the Idaho battlefield, capturing all the action and violence live on camera. At one point, a reporter even gets shot and killed, but war coverage basically continues as if nothing happened. There is no time for emotion in the chase for the best and biggest story, as news anchorman Mel Burgess (Dan Hedaya) sums up: “Stop with the college debate, will you? We're news, emotions happen outside!”

The whole situation with the stumbling reporters in an Idaho battlefield seems almost surreal, but the media will go to any lengths for ratings, influence and prowess over competitors. These scenes are almost as poignant as they are funny, because in the real world, reporters constantly travel to the front lines, sometimes unnecessarily jeopardizing their lives. Furthermore, the very notion by senior colleagues that Leary’s character Vinnie Franko may be replaced by a “young CNN reporter” motivates him to continue reporting amidst the craziness, inasmuch as he doesn’t want to be upstaged by a rookie. Competition is the name of the game in the media business, and Dante effectively portrays this. Franko is also depicted as delirious, misconstruing John Wayne movies for reality, amidst the surreal environment in which he reports. “John Wayne would have gotten us out of Vietnam in a week,” he retorts. This is a subtle but effective comment on the heavy influence of Hollywood heroes and media on our real world perceptions.

Unfortunately, Dante portrays America’s future diversity as one shrouded with chaos and mayhem, a somewhat overly negative outlook. However, his point is clear: In this future scenario, the country is split into ethnic lines, as various sides squabble over somewhat trivial issues. Our only solace is prime time, high octane entertainment – oh pardon me, I mean news. Dante emphasizes that the news is defined by trend and sensationalism, intertwined in the same trendy and sensationalist socio-political public sphere we call our society. This, I believe, is the main point of Dante’s movie. Is he successful at making this point? Yes. Could he have made this point in a less obvious and more subtle way? Yes. Thus, is the movie boring? No; far from it.

If you are a fan of dark humor, satire and a good laugh, then The Second Civil War is a must see. Like News Net, it is made for cable, not the big screen. It won’t win major awards for breakthrough acting any time soon, but it will keep you thinking. You won’t fall out of your seat laughing but you will come out of the theater saying; “Wow, this movie really told the truth.” Let the truth be told, I always say; let the truth be told.

January 16, 2006

Independence.com: The Biafran controversy online

Hey all.
In the link below, you can view my outline for the final assignment for this module. It is still subject to revision and, but hopefully, the main ideas will stay the same.

biafran-flag.gif
Biafran flag. Source: http://biafra.info/biafra/nigeria-biafra-civil-war-photo-essay.html

1) Organization providing virtual public sphere: http://www.biafraland.com

Sub-sites:
http://biafranet.com
http://messageboard.biafranigeriaworld.com

The Biafra Actualization forum (BAF) is an organization solely dedicated to bringing about the independent sovereign Igbo nation of Biafra out of the Republic of Nigeria.

2) Public controversy: The case for the Biafran nation.

A Brief History of The Controversy:

Following independence in the 1960’s, Nigeria’s boundaries became composed of muslim feudal states in the North, and Christian oil rich kingdoms in the south. Nigeria had a federal constitution comprising three regions defined by the principal ethnic groups in the country – the Hausa and Fulani in the North, Yoruba in the south-west, and the Igbo in the south-east. When the military took over in the 60’s, the economic situation worsened and ethnic tensions broke out. Amidst all this, 1 million refugees fled to their Ibo homeland in the east as a result of oppression by other ethnic groups. In 1967, the head of the eastern region, Colonel Emeka Ojukwu, unilaterally declared the independent republic of Biafra. After initial military gains, civil war, and famine, Biafran forces were pushed back. After two and a half years, Biafra reabsorbed into Nigeria.

biaframoney.jpg

biaframoney_2.jpg
Biafran Currency. Source:http://biafra.info/biafra/nigeria-biafra-civil-war-photo-essay.html

The Controversy Today:

Today, the case for the Biafran nation still rages on. The Biafran Igbos argue that Igbo’s are still oppressed to this day, and are excluded from political power, and thus require secession from the rest of Nigeria. Non-Biafran’s and those who do not agree with the Bifran cause insist Nigeria must remain united, and government officials in Nigeria will do anything in their power to prevent an uprising or discourse that may result in uprising or eventual secession.

The Role of the Internet in the Controversy:

The Internet has indeed become an important tool in strengthening the Biafran cause for independence from Nigeria, as it can be used to communicate more easily across the world. Websites like Biafraland.com contain radio addresses, press releases, historical documents, television reels, news, links, email lists, and discussion forums. Moreover, this group uses the Internet to capitalize on its potential to promote freedom of speech, information, and discourse. However, the very fact that this website is based in Washington D.C. may indicate that censorship and the fear to speak up is still prominent in Nigerian society, but in any case, due to the globalizing capacity of the internet, the site can still be viewed in Nigeria by Nigerians. However, anti-Biafran rhetoric and suppression is also very prominent in Nigeria, and the Internet and other traditional media also play an important role here.


Empirical Research:

Key Questions:

How does biafraland.com (and other related websites) provide a new public sphere for information, discussion, and action regarding the Biafran controversy? In this sense, how effective/ineffective is it? Furthermore, what are the possibilities and limitations of dealing with this issue online?
What role do traditional media play in all of this? What are the similarities and differences between modes of information and discourse between old and new media as it relates to this issue? How does such media use affect real world policies and action relating to the Biafran controversy.

Research Approach:

Ethnography:
Show how biafraland.com creates a ‘real’ culture in cyberspace.
Analyze networks around my topic (i.e. discussion forums, etc.)
Informal interviews through email, real world discussion, etc.
Virtual/Non-virtual observation in real time – can I find people that actually use such sites? What kind of content/discourse exists in related sites?

Theoretical Research:

Key Questions:
How can the use and practices of biafraland.com be linked to Habermas’ theories regarding the ideal public sphere/the structural transformation of the public sphere?
How can the use and practices of biafraland.com be linked to new theories/analysis dealing with new media as a public sphere (for example, Lister, Lax, Wilhelm, etc.)?

Other strategies:
-Include quotes and screenshots of virtual community discourse
-Start some of my own threads in discussion forums.